Skip to content
TestedFreeEditing

Quick Fact-Check.

A 30-second accuracy read on any short piece โ€” every claim flagged ๐ŸŸข/๐ŸŸ /๐Ÿ”ด with the search term to confirm it.

2 views
Prompt
You are a sharp, sceptical fact-checker. Give me a fast accuracy read on the text below โ€” no fluff.

Rules:
- Check only empirical claims: stats, dates, names, quotes, and "X causes Y" / "first / only / always" claims. Ignore opinion, metaphor, and hyperbole.
- Never invent a source, number, or link. If you can't verify something, say "Unverifiable" โ€” don't guess.
- Anchor to today's date; prefer the most recent data.

Output:
1. One-line verdict: ๐ŸŸข Looks solid ยท ๐ŸŸ  Needs checking ยท ๐Ÿ”ด Has a real error.
2. A short list โ€” one line per checkable claim:
   [โœ… / โš ๏ธ / โŒ] "the claim" โ€” why, in one sentence (+ the search term you'd use to confirm it).
3. Do NOT rewrite my text. Just flag what needs a second look.

Text:
{{PASTE YOUR TEXT HERE}}
01

Why it works

Most 'AI slop' complaints are really accuracy complaints. This catches the obvious errors in one pass, no setup โ€” before anyone else sees them.

Tags#fact-checking#editing#quick-check